We’ve compared MET-Rx BCAA 2200 with Source Naturals L-Proline L-Lysine. 4.7 VSR - that’s how many MET-Rx BCAA 2200 receives, so he takes first place, its rival Source Naturals L-Proline L-Lysine receives 3.4 VSR. The gap in rating was affected in the first place by the price of amino acids, thus 5 grams of amino acids of MET-Rx BCAA 2200 will cost you $ 0.61, as against $ 1.16 of Source Naturals L-Proline L-Lysine. The serving of MET-Rx BCAA 2200 contains 2200 mg amino acids as against 2200 mg of Source Naturals L-Proline L-Lysine. For a serving of MET-Rx BCAA 2200 you will pay $ 0.27 , and a for a serving of Source Naturals L-Proline L-Lysine you will have to pay $ 0.51.
The MET-Rx BCAA 2200 composition contains vitamins in an amount of 2 as against 1 in Source Naturals L-Proline L-Lysine.
The composition of Source Naturals L-Proline L-Lysine contains the 2 electrolytes, 2 minerals.
MET-Rx BCAA 2200 has no taste, the manufacturer makes it unflavored. Source Naturals L-Proline L-Lysine has no taste, the manufacturer makes it unflavored.
MET-Rx BCAA 2200 and Source Naturals L-Proline L-Lysine have only one size, MET-Rx BCAA 2200 has 180 softgel(s) and Source Naturals L-Proline L-Lysine has 120 tablet(s).
We recommend buying MET-Rx BCAA 2200.